Baby, it's (gonna be) cold outside! So let's look at echinacea (coneflower)

A polar vortex is on its way. Even though I knit myself a balaclava for those cold, windy dog walks, it will be too cold for doggy paws. Time to hunker down and dream about spring.

One reason I focus on native plants is for pollinators. I love seeing the bees, wasps, and whatever those other bugs are buzzing about the blossoms. My yard is a little island of nature in suburbia.

However, natives have some problems, which is why cultivars are developed. One issue I have with "straight" coneflowers is their height. I'm in search of some shorter varieties to plant out front BUT they are generally less attractive to pollinators. What to do?

My late garden blog friend gardeninacity posted about just this problem back in 2021. One future (now past) study he cited was by the Chicago Botanical Garden, but alas, their comparison of coneflower cultivars did not include their value to pollinators. While they observed visiting insects, those observations were casual rather than systemic. Boo.

The Mt. Cuba Center, on the other hand, has included pollinator attraction in their evaluation of echinacea. Their observations and recommendations (which are somewhat local to the east coast) may be found here. I sifted through their list, eliminating the taller varieties, which left five to choose from.

• Echinacea 'Julia'
• Echinacea ‘Balsomcor’ (SOMBRERO® Hot Coral)
• Echinacea ‘TNECHKIO’ (KISMET® Intense Orange)
• Echinacea ‘Snow Cone’
• Echinacea ‘Santa Fe’

I won't make up my mind quite yet, but I am not inclined to choose something white ('Snow Cone').

I'm also interested in a shorter version of rudbeckia, but the only one I have found so far is 'Goldstrum', which I have growing in the meadow. Perhaps I will just transplant that despite not being sure of its attraction to pollinators. Any opinions out there?